While there is no definitive proof that either the Chinese or Kazakh government was behind the effort to remove Atajurt’s channel, it follows a playbook that is becoming increasingly common across the world. Earlier this year, similar attacks had caused Atajurt’s Facebook accounts to be temporarily removed.
#MEDIAHUMAN YOUTUBE DOWNLOADER REVIEW HOW TO#
This would have given it access to thousands of unpublished video testimonies that the group keeps private on YouTube at the request of the witnesses.Īnother Atajurt representative showed MIT Technology Review screenshots of what he said were instructional videos shared on WhatsApp, in Kazakh, teaching viewers how to flag Atajurt’s videos en masse to force YouTube to take them down. Then, in September 2019, after multiple attempts to register Atajurt as a nonprofit in Kazakhstan met with failure, a pro-government group registered a different organization with a similar name and tried to gain control of the YouTube channel. As a result, he faced seven years in jail for “inciting inter-ethnic tensions” and was released only after being forced to agree to stop his activism-an agreement that he ignored once freed. In 2019, Bilash was arrested for his vocal criticism of the Kazakh government’s close ties to China, which he blames for its weak stance in support of ethnic Kazakhs caught up in China’s camps.
![mediahuman youtube downloader review mediahuman youtube downloader review](https://givemecrack.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/iTubeGo-Review-Full-HD-YouTube-Downloader-You-Need-to-Know-1.png)
![mediahuman youtube downloader review mediahuman youtube downloader review](https://i0.wp.com/allpcworlds.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/MediaHuman-YouTube-Downloader-Free-Downlod.jpg)
A battle over YouTube, a battle for narrative YouTube representatives said in an email that its action was the result of “automated messaging that in this case is not related to this creator’s content.”īut it not the first time that Atajurt and Bilash, its founder, have come under attack. It’s unclear why YouTube considers video testimonies from family members of detained Chinese Muslims to be potentially pro-violent criminal or terrorist, or how this relates to YouTube’s earlier statements that Atajurt was inappropriately sharing personally identifiable information.